tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13958708.post113372065345189192..comments2024-03-28T00:08:14.247-07:00Comments on Foster's Theological Reflections: Addressing Robert Bowman's Incomplete Picture of Clement's ChristologyEdgar Fosterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00280475259670777653noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13958708.post-85754019091905958452009-03-08T18:45:00.000-07:002009-03-08T18:45:00.000-07:00I have commented on the Trinity brochure elsewhere...I have commented on the Trinity brochure elsewhere. and its description of the ANF. Maybe the brochure could have been more precise at places and quoted what the early church writers exactly said. But I think the work essentially got the ANF right. For instance, Justin Martyr does call the Son an angel, but I don't think he says the Son was created per se. The implication is certainly there, however. Maybe the remarks concerning Irenaeus or could also have been nuanced. Overall, however, I think there is no major problem with the Trinity brochure treatment of the ANF.Edgar Fosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00280475259670777653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13958708.post-35323118233531788762009-03-06T23:15:00.000-08:002009-03-06T23:15:00.000-08:00Greetings Edgar, I’ve been researching "Should You...Greetings Edgar, <BR/><BR/>I’ve been researching "Should You Believe In Trinity?" brochure and have been defending it for a while. I mainly focused on the Church Fathers (CF) and found the quotes are accurate. I came across a message board and your name came up several times that you were the person to contact regarding the accuracy of the brochure. Can you please give me your honest opinion regarding the brochure? <BR/><BR/>Best RegardsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com