tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13958708.post6782343702465061573..comments2024-03-28T00:08:14.247-07:00Comments on Foster's Theological Reflections: John Gill's Exposition of 1 Timothy 3:16 ("God was manifest in the flesh")Edgar Fosterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00280475259670777653noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13958708.post-79942953993110134942016-02-02T16:02:42.653-08:002016-02-02T16:02:42.653-08:00A few of the modern bible translations are also us...A few of the modern bible translations are also using the older understanding here, like the New King James Bible. I am not sure why they would do this. I agree, the Catholic Bibles also make the correction as well.Philip Fletcherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06423325210695384048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13958708.post-66870953655885550772016-02-01T16:23:39.812-08:002016-02-01T16:23:39.812-08:00Almost everybody (Trinitarians included) now admit...Almost everybody (Trinitarians included) now admit that 1 Timothy 3:16 is not a proof-text for Christ's divinity. Yet one recent book that tries to establish the divinity of Christ, though it's not written by a Greek or Biblical scholar, does use the passage without realizing it's not original. <br /><br />Catholic Bibles also concede the text should not read "God."Edgar Fosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00280475259670777653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13958708.post-39334246096802259702016-02-01T15:16:24.441-08:002016-02-01T15:16:24.441-08:00This another scripture that was poorly translated,...This another scripture that was poorly translated, or was used in the original poorly. Philip Fletcherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06423325210695384048noreply@blogger.com