God was manifest in the flesh; not God essentially considered, or Deity in the abstract, but personally; and not the first nor the third Person; for of neither of them can this or the following things be said; but the second Person, the Word, or Son of God; see 1 John 3:8 who existed as a divine Person, and as a distinct one from the Father and Spirit, before his incarnation; and which is a proof of his true and proper deity: the Son of God in his divine nature is equally invisible as the Father, but became manifest by the assumption of human nature in a corporeal way, so as to be seen, heard, and felt: and by "flesh" is meant, not that part of the body only, which bears that name, nor the whole body only, but the whole human nature, consisting of a true body and a reasonable soul; so called, partly to denote the frailty of it, and to show that it was not a person, but a nature, Christ assumed; and the clause is added, not so much to distinguish this manifestation of Christ from a spiritual manifestation of him to his people, as in distinction from all other manifestations of him in the Old Testament, in an human form for a time, and in the cloud, both in the tabernacle and temple. This clause is a very apt and full interpretation of the word "Moriah", the name of the mount in which Jehovah would manifest himself, and be seen, Genesis 22:2.
Sporadic theological and historical musings by Edgar Foster (Ph.D. in Theology and Religious Studies and one of Jehovah's Witnesses).
This another scripture that was poorly translated, or was used in the original poorly.
ReplyDeleteAlmost everybody (Trinitarians included) now admit that 1 Timothy 3:16 is not a proof-text for Christ's divinity. Yet one recent book that tries to establish the divinity of Christ, though it's not written by a Greek or Biblical scholar, does use the passage without realizing it's not original.
ReplyDeleteCatholic Bibles also concede the text should not read "God."
A few of the modern bible translations are also using the older understanding here, like the New King James Bible. I am not sure why they would do this. I agree, the Catholic Bibles also make the correction as well.
ReplyDelete