Found it on page 206. The foot notes lead to another dead end. And it is still purely assumption built upon assumption. The language has room for alternatives to hunting bow and rainbow but I accept his opinion as no less valid than mine at the moment.
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=RAwg47G0M2IC&pg=PR3&dq=theological+dictionary+of+the+old+testament+xiii&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiErP3v0KrQAhVrBcAKHWt7DmwQ6AEIJzAC#v=onepage&q=201&f=false
ReplyDeleteCan't see pages 201-208 - is this a conspiracy ;)
http://cs539515.vk.me/u61899316/docs/9224c6066178/Theological_Dictionary_of_the_Old_Testament_13.pdf?extra=Q7nAfya7_-OFoyfodw6BpWA5ASQ3zUtPSEX-OJIYIiUsNkrybmJZfBoJKlX3h8PesdIOSmyXyNTbs2CNRUls84aDoDg08F2CBxoj37uI&dl=1
ReplyDeleteFound it on page 206. The foot notes lead to another dead end. And it is still purely assumption built upon assumption. The language has room for alternatives to hunting bow and rainbow but I accept his opinion as no less valid than mine at the moment.