Sunday, September 09, 2018

Moses: The "Meekest" or "Most Humble" Man? (Numbers 12:3)

I've noticed that Numbers 12:3 NWT Study Bible states that Moses "was by far the meekest of all the men" on earth's surface. The footnote adds: "Or 'was very humble (mild-tempered), more so than any other man.'"

NET Bible treats Numbers 12:3 as a parenthetical statement: "(Now the man Moses was very humble, more so than any man on the face of the earth.)"

It explains that the difference in how one reads 12:3 depends on the familiar kethib-qere distinction. Furthermore, NET gives this supplemental information: "The word עָנָו (’anav) means 'humble.' The word may reflect a trustful attitude (as in Pss 25:9, 37:11), but perhaps here the idea of 'more tolerant' or 'long-suffering.' The point is that Moses is not self-assertive. God singled out Moses and used him in such a way as to show that he was a unique leader. For a suggestion that the word means 'miserable,' see C. Rogers, 'Moses: Meek or Miserable?' JETS 29 (1986): 257-63.

The Septuagint (LXX) reads: καὶ ὁ ἄνθρωπος Μωυσῆς πραΰς σφόδρα παρὰ πάντας τοὺς ἀνθρώπους τοὺς ὄντας ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς.

Targum Jonathan: "But the man Mosheh was more bowed down in his mind than all the children of men upon the face of the earth; neither cared he for their words."

Whether Moses was the meekest or the humblest (the man with a very mild disposition), despite the fact that he showed uncharacteristic long-suffering/patience, he eventually "lost it" with his people, the Hebrews (the children of Israel). We all remember when Moses struck the rock at Meribah and exclaimed, “Listen, you rebels, shall we bring water for you out of this rock?” (NRSV) So doing, he took glory for something divinely wrought by Jehovah. The consequence was that Jehovah did not permit Moses to enter the Promised Land even though Jehovah God let him see the land from a distance--and we know that Moses will be resurrected in the new earth to come: he is alive in God's eyes. However, it strikes me as somewhat ironic that Moses had exemplary mildness/meekness and humility, but even he let anger cause him to speak embittered words that resulted in deep loss: "and it went ill with Moses on their account; for they made his spirit bitter, and he spoke words that were rash" (Psalm 106:32-33 NRSV).

The account is a serious warning on the one hand reminding us to guard our spirit and always glorify Jehovah, but it's encouraging to know that the ancient spokespersons of YHWH were individuals with feelings and foibles like ours (James 5:17). Some people often get hung up on the fact that a humble person might write, "I am the most humble person on earth." It's never really bothered me that Moses might have written those words, but some scholars think the utterance is part of an editorial addition later contributed to the Pentateuch: they understand these words to be added and insist Numbers 12:3 could be parenthetical. In any event, the likely reason that 12:3 provides this detail is to let us know that Moses did not usually seek his own glory. Jehovah God (YHWH) appointed Moses as leader over Israel; the office was not gained by inappropriate ambition, but rather through divine appointment (Numbers 12:6-8). What an example that Moses set in humility, meekness or lowliness of mind. Jesus similarly was mild-tempered and lowly in heart (Matthew 5:5; 11:28), but he remained that way without taint.

12 comments:

Duncan said...

Job 24:4 for a concrete understanding.

Duncan said...

https://www.studylight.org/commentary/job/24-4.html

Duncan said...

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=F8Ter5BrKJAC&pg=PA151&dq=job+24:4+humble+poor&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiOsPXs6LDdAhVrCsAKHcEjAyoQ6AEIPjAE#v=onepage&q=job%2024%3A4%20humble%20poor&f=false

Edgar Foster said...

Thanks for the input. On Job 24:4, see BDB's remarks. It links Proverbs 3:34; 16:19 with Numbers 12:3. Psalm 37:11 also appears in the occurrence list. We know that one well.

I could not read the one commentary because of limited access, but I was able to peruse Studylight.

Duncan said...

The commentary highlights etymological relationship with the verbal root ANA (afflicted or distressed) and it relationship in use with EBYON.

https://biblehub.com/text/deuteronomy/15-11.htm

https://biblehub.com/text/psalms/12-5.htm

https://biblehub.com/text/proverbs/31-20.htm

https://biblehub.com/text/isaiah/41-17.htm

https://biblehub.com/text/jeremiah/22-16.htm

https://biblehub.com/text/ezekiel/16-49.htm

Much more info in commentary which is worth reading in detail.

Anonymous said...

Similar language is used of Job... Where they make out he is the most [quality]
I get the feeling its Hebrew/ Greek hyberbole - and self evident that its not literal

Edgar Foster said...

What you say sounds plausible, but I cannot say for sure. However, looking at Numbers 12:3 includes the Hebrew word, meod, which is why the passage is translated "very meek/humble."

On the other hand, Job is described as being "great" (gadol) or the greatest among men from the East. But maybe hyperbole is meant, I'm just not sure in light of the context.

What about Bathsheba? She was "very beautiful," if I remember that account correctly. Should we take that to be hyperbole?

Anonymous said...

"very" is different to "most" or "greatest" - very is subjective in a way, the other 2 equal the "highest" or "top" in a ranking scheme.

for instance take: (NWT): (Job 1:8)
“. . .Have you taken note of my servant Job? There is no one like him on the earth. . .”

this could mean multiple things - he is the only "human" (I doubt it) he is the only person to display a certain quality (I doubt it) he is the only to display a certain quality in a certain amount (slightly more likely) cosndiering the next part of the verse.

I would say the word "greatest" in Jobs case may mean "top" or "most" considering its in Aposition to his stock numbers.

Edgar Foster said...

Not trying to be argumentative, but it seems that very has a range of meanings. Is it subjective? Please see Genesis 1:31. I think King Eglin was also described as very fat in the book of Judges.

But I could see contexts where it might be subjective, with regard to food as an example.

Totally agree with your statements about Job.

Edgar Foster said...

Should be Eglon.

Anonymous said...

not at all, different opinion is always good - I mean if you are "very" [something] the range can be subjective - what I find very beautiful for example, you may not - that's the sense I mean. where as the other 2 are less ambiguous. (using those 2 interchangeably btw)

On Gen 1:31 notice in the book of psalms (compare 19:7/119:72)the law is called "very good" and "perfect" - showing even though "perfect" is not in the Gen clause the sense is still there (compare: Deut 32:6, note this would make no sense if the first creation wasn't considered "perfect" )

Edgar Foster said...

I agree with you that beauty or what's "very beautiful" can differ from person to person, but I guess my view is that "very" might also be objective at times like its use in Genesis 1:31 and when it comes to Jehovah's law or his Word. And yes, I think one can infer perfection from these uses of "very."