My understanding is that the Documentary Hypothesis applies to the Pentateuch, not strictly to the GNT. But source criticism is practiced for GNT documents.
Yeah, that is source criticism when one tries to figure out the sources behind Gospels or other literature. The idea that Mark was written first is also known as Markan Priority: Taylor seems to advocate that view.
This being from 1966, is he working from the view of the documentary hypothesis?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.academia.edu/7265751/Cassuto_s_The_Documentary_Hypothesis_and_the_Paradigm_Shift_in_Biblical_Studies
ReplyDeleteSome of these reviews give you more info concerning Taylor's presuppositions: https://www.amazon.com/Life-Ministry-Jesus-Vincent-Taylor/dp/1178915867
ReplyDeleteI don't think he slavishly adhered to the Documentary Hypothesis/Source Criticism, but I could be wrong.
I briefly discussed the Doc Hypothesis here: https://fosterheologicalreflections.blogspot.com/search?q=documentary+hypothesis
ReplyDeleteMy understanding is that the Documentary Hypothesis applies to the Pentateuch, not strictly to the GNT. But source criticism is practiced for GNT documents.
ReplyDeleteThanks, source criticism, not sure what it was called. I am just referring to the idea that mark is the first g.
ReplyDeleteYeah, that is source criticism when one tries to figure out the sources behind Gospels or other literature. The idea that Mark was written first is also known as Markan Priority: Taylor seems to advocate that view.
ReplyDelete