1. Cambridge Latin Course (Four Volumes). Published by Cambridge University Press.
2. Brown, Peter (editor) and Augustine of Hippo. Confessions. Reprint edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000.
3. Appiah, Kwame Anthony. In My Father's House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture. London: Methuen; New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
4. Austin, J.L. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University. Editors, J.O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà ), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962 [updated in 1975].
5. Tillich, Paul. The Courage To Be. Yale University Press, 1952. Print.
6. Molloy, Michael. Experiencing the World's Religions: Tradition, Challenge, and Change. Seventh edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2017.
7. Pustejovsky, James. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995. Print.
8. Saeed, John I. Semantics. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. Print.
9. Niditch, Susan. War in the Hebrew Bible: A Study in the Ethics of Violence. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. Print.
10. Fretheim, Terence E. The Suffering of God: An Old Testament Perspective. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984. Print.
11. Palmer, Michael W. Levels of Constituent Structure in New Testament Greek. New York: Peter Lang, 1995. Print.
12. Hengel, Martin. Crucifixion in the Ancient World and the Folly of the Message of the Cross. Translated by John Bowden. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977. Print.
13. Frankl, Viktor. Man's Search for Meaning. Beacon Press, 2006. Print.
14. Cooper, John W. Our Father in Heaven: Christian Faith and Inclusive Language for God. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1998. Print.
15. Cooper, John W. Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1989. Print.
16. Meye Thompson, Marianne. The Promise of the Father: Jesus and God in the New Testament. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2000. Print.
17. Kasper, Walter. Jesus the Christ. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1977. Print.
18. Ozment, Steven. The Age of Reform, 1250-1550: An Intellectual and Religious History of Late Medieval and Reformation Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980. Print.
19. Metzger, Bruce M. The Bible in Translation: Ancient and English Versions. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2001. Print.
20. Giles, Kevin. The Trinity & Subordinationism: The Doctrine of God and the Contemporary Gender Debate. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002. Print.
21. Hallman, Joseph M. The Descent of God: Divine Suffering in History and Theology. Minneapolis, Fortress Press, 1991.
22. O'Collins S.J., Gerald. The Tripersonal God; Understanding and Interpreting the Trinity. Mahway, NJ: Paulist Press, 1999. Print.
23. Bradley, James and Richard A. Muller. Church History: An Introduction to Research. Methods and Resources. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1995 [updated in 2016]. Print.
24. Studer, Basil, and Andrew Louth (translator). Trinity and Incarnation: The Faith of the Early Church. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1993. Print.
25. Burgess, Stanley M. The Holy Spirit: Eastern Christian Traditions. Hendrickson, 1989.
Paul Tillich? I wouldn't have guessed that, what do you think of his work?
ReplyDeleteYeah, I went through my Tillich phase years ago. I read The Courage To Be, Dynamics of Faith, his Systematic Theology and a work he wrote about religion. One of my professors also gave me his thesis on Tillich, which I probably still have.
DeleteWhat do you think about Tillich's approach? his "ground of all being" theology?
ReplyDeleteWhat's your takeaway from Tillich's theology? How do you feel about the whole "ground of being" approach?
ReplyDeleteOne work I left out by Tillich was his brief work detailing the history of Christianity. As I now look back at Tillich's theology, while I find some things of value in his writings, I find his overall approach to be limited and disappointing. Tillich is often misunderstood because he tried to reframe Reformation thought in existential terms; hence, the "ground of all being" talk and his emphasis on the "courage to be" or "the God above God."
ReplyDeleteI discussed Tillich's thought in my dissertation (Glasgow University). One of the university examiners was taken aback to see me interact with Tillich, but what most caught my attention then were his ideas about symbolic theology. If you've ever read Bultmann or Martin Heidegger, then you can more readily understand Tillich's project and his penchant for existentialism.
It's been a long time since I read Tillich: in addition to his abstract theology, he had some personal failings too that disappointed me. I still like his critique of the Incarnation doctrine.
See https://fosterheologicalreflections.blogspot.com/2005/09/paul-tillichs-inexpressible.html
ReplyDeleteThanks, I've read a bit of Bultmann (his historical Jesus stuff, and stuff on the gospels, his theology of demythologizing doesn't interest me all that much), and Heidegger I've only intereacted with in secondary material (I don't have the guts to read him himself, I barely can grasp anything in secondary material).
ReplyDeleteThanks for the link to an older blog post :). Tillich seems a little like Pseudo-Dionysius in this post ... focusing on total trascendence and absoluteness being "beyond" all created categories and distinctions.
Is his "symbolic theology" similar to the Dionysian notion of "names of God"? I.e. they don't describe God, but they point to him?
PS: Sorry for the double post earlier, and thanks for enternaining my questions.
Many scholars give acclaim to Bultmann's commentary on the fourth Gospel, but I like his analysis of the Johannine Epistles better: Paul Anderson gives a helpful critique of Bultmann's "John" commentary in Anderson's work about Johannine Christology.
ReplyDeleteFor the record, I'm not recommending that anyone read Martin Heidegger's "Sein und Zeit" (Being and Time) although the work is historically important and helps students of Bultmann and Tillich to grasp what each writer was doing, Being and Time is a drudgery for most people and I found it to be redundant. Some of Heidegger isn't too bad, but his major work is hard to finish. Furthermore, Heidegger was part of the National Socialist Party at one point, which perpetually stained his reputation.
That's a good way of looking at Tillich. I think he was trying to talk the ineffable, being-itself or absolute reality. I believe Tillich ultimately thought that God is being-itself and above all categorization.
See https://www.jstor.org/stable/1200689?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents