Wednesday, June 26, 2024

Pondering Genesis 28:11-12 (Ladder, Stairs, Ramp)

Looking at Genesis 28:11-12 again, it's funny how new details become salient each time and things become clearer with one more read. The word normally translated "ladder" (sullam) in that account could be rendered "stairway" or ramp. Moreover, the ladder/stairway could have been made from stone steps.

Another important detail is that Jehovah (YHWH) possibly was at the top of the ladder on which angels ascended and descended (Genesis 28:13) or others understand the text to say YHWH was beside Jacob. The Hebrew allows for different renderings, but I still have my reservations about the idea that Jacob beheld a heavenly sanctuary at the top of the ladder. Of course, he was having a dream/vision, which is another thing to keep in mind.

27 comments:

Duncan said...

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/leithart/2015/09/ascending-and-descending/

Duncan said...

Brenton LXX 12 and dreamed, and behold a ladder fixed on the earth, whose top reached to heaven, and the angels of God >>ascended and descended<< on it.

Edgar Foster said...

https://www.academia.edu/103043412/Going_Up_and_Going_Down_A_Key_to_Interpreting_Jacobs_Dream_Gen_28_1022_?rhid=28970304496&swp=rr-rw-wc-14439344

Anonymous said...

Does the word really have any theological implications- don’t they all essentially mean the same thing?

Edgar Foster said...

Some might find theological significance in the potential meanings, but my concern with these verses is chiefly philological. Of course, there are different shades of meaning between ladder, stairway and ramp--plus some perceive sanctuary overtones and other themes in the account.

Duncan said...

Comes back to - what are angels? At least in this instance.

Duncan said...

In that this might be making something out of nothing - https://www.logos.com/grow/sons-of-israel-or-sons-of-god-in-deuteronomy-32-8-9/

Edgar Foster said...

Duncan, I was more focused on sullam than the angels, but I wouldn't be surprised if the scholarly consensus is that the angels here are spirit creatures. Otherwise, one might have to posit human messengers ascending and descending from above.

See https://www.academia.edu/14025406/A_Narrative_Analysis_of_Genesis_28_10_22?hb-sb-sw=35695175

Edgar Foster said...

https://www.sefaria.org/Rashi_on_Genesis.28.12.1?lang=bi

Edgar Foster said...

John 1:51

Duncan said...

As a philological discussion I would not have thought that GJohn or Rashi have any real bearing on the conclusions.

Duncan said...

Also, if we are looking at John 1:51, which doe not really tell us anything on its own, let's not forget John 1:30.

Duncan said...

The paragraph on page 5 of that paper basically side steps the issue of ascending coming before descending and is still highly ambiguous as to what "angel" signifies other than to mention god's involvement, that I have no problem with.

Duncan said...

I don't really think any discussion on philology has much point if we are just going to say what the current consensus is. Why bother?

Duncan said...

Matthew 28:2 don't angels descend first?

aservantofJEHOVAH said...

John ch.3:30,31NKJV"He must become greater; I must become less.” h

31The one who comes from above is above all; the one who is from the earth belongs to the earth, and speaks as one from the earth. The one who comes from heaven is above all."
John ch 3:13NKJV"No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man. e "
John ch.8:23NKJV"But he continued, “You are from below; I am from above. You are of this world; I am not of this world."

Edgar Foster said...

My comment about philology was referring the sullam, which was supposed to be the main focus of this post. I did not put the emphasis on angels.

Edgar Foster said...

GJohn 1:51 is probably an allusion to Gen. 28 and Rashi, like many others, thinks the angels in the verse are spirit beings.

Duncan said...

Servant, so was John the dipper from heaven too?

Duncan said...

Servant, John ch 3:13 - so you think this is taking about time coming from a place called "heaven" as opposed to coming from god.

Duncan said...

https://biblehub.com/text/john/18-36.htm

Note that unlike the NIV there is no mention of "place".

Duncan said...

Sullam and the ascension to "mount" Zion. Most likely steps or path. Not ladder.

Duncan said...

JPS - He had a dream; a stairway *stairway Or “ramp”; others “ladder.” Heb. sullam. was set on the ground and its top reached to the sky, and messengers of God were going up and down on it.

aservantofJEHOVAH said...

Jesus would not be unique in simply coming from God. All men Come from God. Jesus was talking about something that distinguished him from every other man that has ever lived including the first Adam.

Duncan said...

Rashi - עלים וירדים ASCENDING AND DESCENDING — It states first ascending and afterwards descending! Those angels who accompanied him in the land of Israel were not permitted to leave the Land: they ascended to Heaven and angels which were to minister outside the Land descended to accompany him (Genesis Rabbah 68:12).

A little confused but he recognises the problem in the text.

aservantofJEHOVAH said...

What did John say about himself that would warrant the conclusion that he taught he was from heaven?
Matthew ch.11:11NKJV"“Assuredly, I say to you, among those born of women there has not risen one greater than John the Baptist; but he who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he."

Edgar Foster said...

A number of interesting points are brought out in this article concerning sullam and angels, including Rashi's perspective: https://www.thetorah.com/article/jacobs-dream-why-do-gods-angels-ascend-and-descend