Monday, February 26, 2024

Writing Out Arguments and Logical Forms Facillitates Understanding

 Thhe following could apply to learning a language too.

It seems that the logical memory device known as "Cesare" goes like this:

1) No P are M
2) All S are M
3) Ergo, no S are P

The argument's validity can be demonstrated by means of a reductio ad aburdum argument (also known as reductio per impossibile):

1a) No P are M
2a) Some S are P
3a) Ergo, some S are not M

3a) contradicts 2) and 2a) contradicts 3). Notice the false conclusion as well in the reductio example.
So, it helps to write these things out and clarifies what's happening in arguments and language. Consulting Aristotle's square of opposition might shed some additional light on what's happening in these arguments.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

But if we take this too the Bible - isn't it well known the writers omitted information that was so obvious to the reader they didn't bother to even explain, as we do today aswell...

Edgar Foster said...

I agree, much of the way that the Bible and we communicate is implicit. A lot of things are taken for granted in everyday discourse.